Report of the World Players’ Council to the 72nd FIDE Congress

 

 

         The World Palyers’ Council had celebrated several meetings in the course of the year 2001 (San Petersburg, El Escorial, Beijing). It’s a matter of special pride for us that the Council has gradually grown into a veritable “international think tank” uniting both the intellectual elite of professional players and a great number of dedicated amateurs from all over the world. A great educational job is being done on Internet: to our permanent address http://w.p.c.tripod.com we are planning soon to add a new site http://www.cyberwpc.com which is currently being developed by our US filial members.

Since March 2001 a weekly Internet Russian-language magazine “Chess Satyricon” http://home.att.net/~satiricon/home.html is being published under the auspices of the WPC. It wouldn’t be exaggeration to claim that it is the first entirely independent, non-commercial, non-partisan chess-political weekly in chess history - done by the players and for the players. Our editorial team consists of the best chess writers of the moment guided by the sole objective of providing the lovers of our game with truthful unbiased information on the most important chess events. All of them deserve the highest praise for their arduous selfless efforts. While the vast majority of other chess publications like “New in Chess”, “Jaque”, “Gambito”, “Inside Chess”, “64”, “TWIC”, “Kasparovchess” and so on, - all depend on some obscure sources of financing and therefore their editors work under obligation to advance certain political agendas (often unsavoury, ignoble and uncouth), our staff is only concerned with shedding the light of truth on the matters otherwise ignored by the “professional journalists”. Needless to say, the gratitude of our readers is by itself the best remuneration for these disinterested efforts.

We would like further to draw attention of the delegates of the 72nd FIDE Congress to the following issues of importance:

1.      FIDE World Cup series;

2.      European Championships – 2001;

3.      Rapid rating list;

4.      Anti-democratic attitude of certain chess journalists;

5.      The New Chess Guild at the Top Level – KKK;

6.      Unfounded pretensions of Vladimir Kramnik to the title of the World Champion;

7.      Fraudulent financial practices of the US Chess Federation.

 

 

1)     At the beginning of the year at the request of the FIDE President the WPC had developed a system of Grand Prix points calculation that provided FIDE with a realistic opportunity to launch its Grand Prix Series already in 2001. It was a highly democratic system, open to every player in the world, not requiring any additional financial investment on the part of FIDE. It counted with personal approval of the World Champion Anand and vice-Champion Shirov. It is with utmost regret that we have to inform the delegates that this system was plainly rejected by Mr.Artem Tarasov who acted on this occasion on behalf of the Octagon Company.

 

2)     European Championships in Warsaw (women) and Ohrid (men) were a welcome addition to the international chess calendar. However the organization of both events was subjected to well-grounded criticism by some of the participants. We have received several complaints concerning the boarding costs, which had been elevated to such a level (over 100 DM per day) that forced a number of qualified players to cancel their participation. We strongly recommend to the European Chess Union to reconsider its organizational policy in this respect in order to guarantee cheaper room rates for the players from poorer countries who do not dispose of means ample enough to endure so high tournament expenses. It is also our deep conviction that the clause limiting the number of the players from the same country (by 20) should be abolished as a clear discrimination against traditionally strong chess federations. Let’s not forget that these are the OPEN tournaments. Finally, the choice of Macedonia as the venue of the men’s event clearly didn’t take into account the aggressive external policy of the USA that destabilized the political situation on the Balkans to the extent that made a trip there hazardous for the very security of the peace-loving players (http://www.clubkasparov.ru/site/rev/polemic/art18.htm ).

 

3)     We would like to attract your attention to some irregularities in the last FIDE Rapid Rating List. For some incomprehensible reasons it did not incorporate the results of the traditional open rapid tournament in Boadilla del Monte (Colegio Mirabal), won by the World Champion Viswanathan Anand. Here are the explanations offered on the FIDE website by Mr.Willy Iclicky, responsible for the committed ‘mistake’:

     > 07.08.2001/
      5th Rapid Rating List
      Dear friends,
      I'm releasing now the 5th rapid rating list which includes some interesting tournaments like Cannes, Mainz, Monaco, Zurich, Tallinn, European tie-breaks and some interesting national championships and private tournaments or matches.
      Despite a loss of four points, M.Adams managed to keep his first place thanks to an impressive comeback in Mainz. V.Anand lost his second place to G.Kasparov due to an inadequate result in Monaco (I'm sorry for him but I never got the final cross table of Marabal tournament (Spain) which he won. Did this result cost him the first place?)…<

 

The statement of Mr.Iclicky is not substantiated by the facts. We have received a declaration of Juan Carlos Ruiz, director of the website “Hechiceros del tablero” (www.hechiceros.net ) who had personally sent the final cross table of the IV Mirabal Tournament to Mr.Iclicky (immediately upon its termination) and even was thanked by him for doing so (see the picture):

 

>Juan Carlos Ruiz, director de la web Hechiceros del tablero (www.hechiceros.net) declara que Mr. Iclicki le escribió pidiéndole la tabla cruzada del IV Torneo Internacional Mirabal, a efectos de calcular el Elo de ajedrez rápido. La tabla cruzada le fue enviada inmediatamente, recibiendo las gracias del interesado. Incluso pocos días después, Mr. Iclicki volvió a escribir enviando información sobre el Grand Prix de ajedrez rápido.

Mr. Iclicki no sólo recibió la tabla cruzada del torneo ganado por Viswanathan Anand, sino que confirmó la recepción de los datos solicitados. Además, tal información ha estado publicada en www.hechiceros.net desde el día que finalizó el torneo, existiendo link a la misma desde páginas web como el mismo TWIC.

  Firmado:

Juan Carlos Ruiz

17-8-2001<

  Here in the WPC we would like to get more coherent explanations from Mr.Iclicky, preferably not in such a flagrant contradiction with the reality as the previous one.

 

4) Another complaint has reached us from the United States. The letter below deals with aggressively racist attitude of some of the professional journalists who happen to be, besides, sworn enemies to FIDE and to the democratic ideals it represents in the world of chess.

  >Dear Valery,

  As a big fan for your fight against injustice in the Chess world and as bigger fan of a person, who does it without asking the obvious question "Whats in it for me?” Mr. Salov, My respect for you has grown by infinite amount. Anyway, I would like to bring forward, some of my sightings on the Chess Internet to you. Please, decide for yourself, as to what you think about this.

  The tournament in concern is Wijk aan Zee 2001. The magazine in concern is "The Week in Chess (TWIC)". The editor of this magazine is Mark Crowther, the concerned Journalist of the article is John Henderson and this magazine is sponsored by "London Chess Center", whose main organizer (patron?) is IM Malcolm Pein.

    Here is my complaint. During Wijk aan Zee (2001 edition) tournament, TWIC was publishing daily reports. In one of them there were some "Unpublishable", "uncouth" remarks by Mr. Henderson, who was providing the reports for TWIC.

  The remark was Racial in nature, and no respectable magazine anywhere in the world, in any field (sports/chess or otherwise) would have published it.

  This particular round report had racial comments against African Americans and or of people of the Negroid Race. I myself am from India, originally, but still the article was simply out of place. To simply put it, it’s Year 2001, wake up!!. Specifically the term "Nigger", which is a racially derogatory term was used.

  The context was, "Shave - a - Nigger"!!. In other words, it was used as a joke in context of a well known Chess opening Scheveningen. Prior to this, I was a very loyal TWIC reader and in all sincerity had brought this incident to Mark Crowther's attention. The query I had sent Mark was " if this was intentional or a printing (spelling if you will) mistake"!

  To my surprise, back came the reply, that it was intentional. As a supporting argument, Mr.Crowther went to the extent of suggesting, that, "one must take the good with the otherwise" !!

  Ok, So, I sent another email to Mr. Crowther saying, that it was not a responsible Journalistic thing to do on his part and

  1. He must in the least reprimand Mr. Henderson, and re-publish the article with an apology to the ethnic group involved.

2. If Mr. Henderson refuses, then the article must be removed from the public site TWIC, and Mr. Henderson be fired.

After all we are talking about Chess, a Mind and Intellectual sport and not some WWF wrestling match for the mentally challenged!

  Well,  to my surprise, Mr. Crowther's response was cold, and he refused to admit his folly (in printing such material). At this point I turned off all communications with Mr. Crowther (with whom I had been communicating for some time now), and turned on a filter in my email system, to reject specific emails from the addressee "mark crowther" automatically.

  Mr. Crowther, then used a different alias, to get in touch with me via email of course (and my email client admitted it, because he used a different alias for the purpose), asking why I had turned off our communication?

  Just like that! As if there had been nothing going on!! :). I re-iterated my complaint to Mr. Crowther, who finally, changed the wordings on the TWIC site. This was done after about a week of "Back and forth emails".

  Anyway, there had been too much bad taste left in my mouth. I mean I had to fight this man, to turn off Racially inflammatory comments on his site. It was worse than pulling teeth, and as just a simple Chess fan, with other responsibilities, I am just bitter and prefer to stay out of this nonsense.

  Regards,

-Srini Ramiah<

 

     It’s not for the first time, unfortunately, that we experience this kind of problem with the journalists mentioned in the letter. They had on various occasions before displayed the same belligerently racist attitude, and are simply not accustomed to take into consideration any points of view that deviate from their own racist political agenda. Exactly the same attitudes maintain the journalists from “New in Chess” (Dirk Jan ten Geuzendam, Hans Ree) and a number of other western and eastern journalists (Leontxo García, Denis Bilunov, Lev Hariton, etc.) with stern Zionist views. The World Players’ Council does its utmost to educate these journalists, to encourage their gradual shift toward democracy but the task is not easy. These are very obstinate, stiff-necked individuals with only a very limited capacity for an open and democratic dialogue. In the first place they do not recognize the chess players’ right to have and express their own democratic point of view, they ignore our emails, letters, articles and memorandums, categorically refuse to publish them. Instead of coming into Reason they regularly misuse their monopolistic control of the mainstream media to slander the WPC and denigrate its President. The good part of the story is that no one believes these sons of abyss, sin and sorrow anyway; almost no one cares about their lies in the press.

Our firm commitment to the democratic ideals fills us with optimism in regard to the future developments. We hope that the delegates of the Congress will not fail to follow the footsteps of YMCA (Young Men’s Christian Association), WCC (World Council of Churches) and the UNO (United Nations Organization) in their resolute condemnation of the traditional enemies of the freedom of speech.

        

5)     The Guild at the Top Level was born on April 20, 2001. Messrs. Karpov, Kasparov and Kramnik had successfully overcome their feuds of yore to address in a letter “the world chess community”. The threesome has openly united in the face of their common enemy: the democratic tendencies in the world of chess. We leave without further comments this letter, as it has already been answered by a group of chess players on behalf of the World Players’ Council (http://ajedrez_democratico.tripod.com/WPC-vs-KKK.htm ).

 

6)     We would like to re-iterate once again our deepest regret in view of the unabating attempts of Vladimir Kramnik to auto-proclaim himself a “World Chess Champion” whereas the legitimacy of his claims do not stand to the slightest scrutiny. Let’s never allow to pass into oblivion the fact that he has lost even qualification match on the way to this so-called “ World Championship”. The lamentable support to his claims from the hard-core anti-democratic faction of the chess journalists is yet another indication of their utter contempt for the notions of common sense, legality and the most elementary principles of human decency. At the same time, FIDE should also be more active and consistent in its public relations campaign. The members of our organization have a strong impression that a number of FIDE’s representatives are continuously playing the double game to the great detriment to its prestige, reputation and credibility and therefore cause a great damage to the interests of the professional players. (See the clause 3 of this report) We do not think to leave it at that and will continue our ethical cleansing in the world of professional chess.

The good news is that the nefarious Braingames Network event in London (2000) has at last aroused interest of the British Police. Hopefully the tricksters will have finally to pay for their swindling. A lawsuit was also filed in Spain against D. Luis Rentero as financially responsible President of the WCC (World Chess Council), the heir to the PCA and the predecessor of the BGN.

                  

7)     Let me inform you, dear delegates, on a more personal note, about my grievances in the hands of the US Chess Federation and its filial company GamesParlor, Inc. In August 2000 I had a pleasure of giving an online conference to the USCF members, which was only one of the activities within the framework of an ambitious Internet project under the auspices of the USCF. During the Olympiad in Istanbul (November 2000) I was paid by cheque (signed by Ms. Amy Sullivan) a sum of $1.000 for the said conference. An attempt to cash the cheque in Spain had, however, backfired on me. The cheque was turned back as the result of insufficient funds on the corresponding account (with all due expenses charged to my own account).

 

 

 

 

In his passionate diatribe against FIDE last year GM Yasser Seirawan had caustically observed that giving away bouncing cheques (a crime incurred by Mr.Israel Gelfer in Las Vegas 1999) constituted grave criminal offence in the United States. Do we have to assume that the criminals are ruling the USCF and its filial organizations? I hope - not.

In the mid-January 2001, following the advice of Ms. Barbara deMaro, I had contacted by email Ms. Amy Sullivan, who immediately promised me to resolve the problem within a few days. One month later, with still no news from the USA, I had contacted her again but this time received no reply at all. Up to the moment I have yet not received any payment. Has the USCF gone bankrupt?

Perhaps this whole affair might be considered not serious enough to bring it to the attention of the General Assembly if it were not for the fact that it perfectly reflects on the general climate in the world of chess nowadays. The principle guilt for this falls at those journalists who by their continuous lies, demagoguery and utter contempt for the basic rights of the professional players make it all but impossible for us to aspire after just and even-handed treatment by bureaucrats of all levels. Alas, I’m forced to admit that part of the guilt lies with the GMs like Kasparov, Kramnik, Gulko and my good friend Yasser. We still have a long road ahead of us.

 

Wishing you a lot of success in your work in Halkidiki,

GM Valery Salov,

World Players’ Council, President

September 2, 2001, Madrid

 

        Home